Report a claimGet a certificateMake a changeLog in
riza

insurance in the QoE, in dollars.

In a quality of earnings review, insurance shows up three ways: recurring cost, hidden risk, and one-time items. Here’s where each one belongs.

start a diligence

MARKETS WE PLACE THROUGH

Progressive Commercial
Chubb
Travelers
Nationwide
AmTrust
CNA
biBerk
ERGO NEXT
THREE

put the insurance dollars in the workbook before price is locked.

The short answer. Normalize run-rate premiums into EBITDA, flag underinsurance as a go-forward cost, treat recoveries as non-recurring, and put D&O or claims-made tail premiums in the closing sources and uses. Get the dollars into the workbook before price is locked.

By Nick McClish, Managing Partner · 6 min read · Reviewed October 13, 2026

what are the key takeaways?

  • 1

    Run-rate, not noise.

    Keep recurring premiums in the earnings view and pull one-time items out.

  • 2

    Underinsurance in dollars.

    Put the go-forward gap in the pro forma, not only in a risk note.

  • 3

    Tails at closing.

    Treat claims-made runoff as a sources-and-uses item, not ongoing EBITDA.

what do buyers and QoE teams usually ask?

  • What is the true run-rate insurance spend after we own this company?
  • Is the target underinsured relative to peers, lenders, landlords, or customer contracts?
  • Which premiums or recoveries are non-recurring and should come out of EBITDA?
  • Will we need a D&O, E&O, or cyber tail at close, and is that a purchase-price or closing-cost item?
  • Do open claims, loss runs, or an ugly experience mod change the go-forward cost or the debt package?
  • What belongs in the QoE report versus a separate insurance diligence memo?

These are diligence questions. They are not coverage advice. Actual terms depend on underwriting and the forms on the binder or policy.

where does each insurance item land in a QoE?

Six items that often show up in an insurance file. Pick where each one goes, then check the reasoning against the patterns below.

Try it

1 of 6

Where does this go?

Recurring general liability and property premiums that continue at similar limits

Illustrative patterns only. A real item can need more than one treatment, and the QoE provider and counsel own the accounting on a real deal.

how does insurance show up in QoE and EBITDA adjustments?

Illustrative patterns only. Every deal is different. Counsel and the QoE provider own the accounting treatment.

1. Premiums (run-rate vs noise)

  • Keep in EBITDA: recurring general liability, property, auto, workers’ comp, umbrella, cyber, D&O, and benefits admin fees that will continue under new ownership at similar limits.
  • Normalize up: if the seller is underinsured, the go-forward program often costs more. Show the gap as a pro forma or run-rate adjustment, in dollars per year, not as a vague risk note. The QoE provider decides where it sits in adjusted EBITDA.
  • Normalize down or remove: one-time surge premiums, short-period policies bought only for the sale process, prepaid expenses that will not repeat, and owner personal lines wrongly booked in the company.

2. Underinsurance

  • Common tells: low general liability or umbrella limits versus contracts, missing cyber on a SaaS or payment-heavy business, no employment practices liability with a large headcount, property limits below replacement cost, and workers’ comp class codes that look wrong.
  • QoE output should say something like: “Illustrative go-forward premium increase of $X to $Y based on an indication” and mark it as illustrative, not a quote.

3. Recoveries and claim cash

  • Insurance recoveries, subrogation, and large claim reimbursements are often non-recurring. Pull them out of adjusted EBITDA unless the business shows a true repeating recovery pattern. Business interruption proceeds are a judgment call for the QoE provider.
  • Uninsured losses and deductibles paid in the stub period may need the opposite treatment: add back only what will not recur, and disclose residual exposure.

4. D&O and other claims-made tails

  • Change-of-control deals often call for a D&O runoff (tail) for pre-close acts, commonly for six years. A six-year tail is commonly priced at roughly 150% to 300% of the expiring annual D&O premium, and merger agreements often cap the buyer’s share near 300%. Actual pricing depends on underwriting. Who pays is a negotiated point; see Hunton on D&O tail coverage in M&A.
  • Treat the tail premium as a closing / sources-and-uses item. Who pays is a negotiated purchase-agreement point, not ongoing EBITDA.
  • The same idea applies to E&O, cyber, and other claims-made lines when the seller’s policy ends at close.

5. Debt-like and working-capital items

Unpaid premiums and audit premiums due can be debt-like. Collateral posted with a carrier is usually a restricted asset of the target, so list who funds replacement collateral at close and who gets the old collateral back. Deductible funding and self-insured reserves can be debt-like or working capital, depending on the purchase agreement.

what does a useful insurance finding look like in dollars?

A useful insurance input to QoE is short and numeric. The shape below is illustrative only.

Illustrative findings in dollars
FindingQoE / deal treatmentIllustrative dollars
Seller general liability and umbrella below customer contract minimumsIncrease go-forward operating expense in the pro forma+$18k to $30k / yr premium (indication)
One large property recovery in the trailing twelve monthsRemove from adjusted EBITDA-$220k from EBITDA
Six-year D&O tail required at closeSources and uses; the purchase agreement allocates the payerIllustrative: 150% to 300% of a $40k expiring premium, or about $60k to $120k one-time
Workers’ comp mod elevated; class mix oddFlag renewal risk; may affect lender covenants+$40k / yr sensitivity at next renewal
Open claim with $50k self-insured retention unpaidDebt-like or working capital$50k reserve at close

Hand the QoE team a policy schedule (carrier, line, limit, deductible, period, premium), three to five years of loss runs, current certificates and any landlord or customer insurance exhibits, known claims and correspondence, and a one-page findings memo tied to EBITDA versus closing costs.

Riza’s job as a licensed insurance agency in diligence is to help translate program facts into that dollar memo. Placement, if any, happens separately and only through a binder or policy.

how do asset and stock deals change the insurance questions?

The comparison below is a diligence checklist. The purchase agreement controls the outcome. It is not a statement that either structure is covered.

Asset purchase compared with a stock purchase or merger
Diligence questionAsset purchaseStock purchase or merger
Go-forward programOften a new program for the buyer’s entity. Price that run-rate into the pro forma.The operating entity usually continues. Normalize the current program, then add any underinsurance gap.
Historical liabilityOften negotiated in the purchase agreement. Confirm what stays with the seller.The entity keeps its history, including past acts and open claims. Change of control and historical liability are diligence and purchase-agreement questions.
Claims-made linesPrior acts stay a tail and purchase-agreement question. New acts need a go-forward program.Change of control typically converts the seller’s D&O policy to runoff for pre-close acts only. A D&O, E&O, or cyber tail is a sources-and-uses item, not ongoing EBITDA.
Cash at closeUnpaid premiums, audit premiums, and collateral still need a dollar list.The same items, plus reserves or deductible funding that may travel with the entity.

when should the QoE team loop in an insurance specialist?

  • The QoE is underway and nobody has priced go-forward coverage yet.
  • The deal is a stock purchase or merger, with change-of-control and historical liability risk.
  • Claims-made lines exist, such as D&O, E&O, cyber, or miscellaneous professional.
  • Lenders, including SBA lenders, may require hazard or flood insurance with a loss payee or mortgagee clause, or a life insurance collateral assignment.
  • The target looks underinsured, or contracts demand higher limits than the current program.
  • There is a PEO, captive, or high-deductible plan that affects cash.

Earlier is better. Overlap between the letter of intent and the QoE beats the final two weeks before close.

Nick McClish, Managing Partner, Riza Risk

who wrote this guide?

Nick McClish, Managing Partner, Riza Risk

Nick McClish is Managing Partner of Riza Risk, a licensed insurance agency. He founded and sold Pluto Pet Insurance, and he was the first U.S. hire at ManyPets, where he led global growth and the U.S. launch as premium grew from $33M to $280M. He raised and led a search fund, founded Day One Growth, and holds an MBA from London Business School.

good to know.

Straight answers to what deal teams ask about insurance in the quality of earnings.

Does insurance belong in QoE or only in legal diligence?

Both. Legal diligence reads contracts and claims. QoE needs the earnings and cash effects. The clean handoff is a dollar findings list.

Is a higher go-forward premium always an EBITDA haircut?

Often it is a pro forma operating-expense increase. Whether it changes the valuation multiple or the purchase price is a deal decision, not an insurance rule.

Are tails EBITDA adjustments?

Usually no. They are closing costs or purchase-price and indemnity economics. Put them in sources and uses and in the purchase agreement.

Can you promise the adjusted EBITDA number?

No. Riza does not set QoE adjustments. We help surface insurance facts and illustrative cost ranges for the QoE provider and buyer to use.

Will Riza place coverage as part of the QoE?

QoE support and placement are different workstreams. Any coverage is subject to underwriting and policy forms. Only a binder or policy creates coverage.

see it in dollars before you sign.

Riza helps turn program facts into dollars a deal team can use. Placement, if any, is a separate step.

start a diligenceor call 802-GOT-RIZA